Southern Slavery And Its Impact On American Society

During early 19th century, the entrenchment of Southern slavery, there was discussion between planters who benefitted from it and abolitionists who fought against it. Most Americans, especially those in Southern states, understood that slavery system could not help parting from their economic and social system. Southern slavery system brought big economical benefits. However, it negatively influenced American society as a whole rather that positively. Southern economy was the center of plantation that cultivated cotton. Many the rich started to carve the plantation to earn money by exporting cotton. They needed a lot of labor and slavery was proper to use. The majority of white southerners did not own slaves because planters monopolized the best land. They could not help taking possession of the land that was not proper to cultivate cotton. Most of them earned a living by self-sufficiency even though the slave population was growing: from 697,624 in 1790 to 3,953,760 in 1860. Southern slavery was based on paternalism to justify the brutal reality of slavery, in which slaveholding gentlemen took personal responsibility for the physical and moral well being of their dependents – women, children, and slaves. The slave owner demanded unquestioning obedience from their dependents and intended to make them perfectly dependent to the white man. Most planters lived on their plantation with compelling strict order. Without the owner’s permission, slavesShow MoreRelatedSlavery And Its Impact On The United States986 Words   |  4 PagesSlavery dates back to as early as 1760 BC. It is defined as the condition of a slave; in bondage. A slave is a person who is the property of and wholly subject to another; a bond servant. It fiendishly raised its repugnant head amongst many cultures and nations around the world. Many people viewed slavery as immoral and some viewed it as a necessary evil. However evil, it may have been, it did have a tremendous impac t on shaping the United States, particularly the South. From the period of 1800 toRead MoreLEQ1206 Words   |  5 Pagesdevelopment of the Atlantic slave trade and the time period right after its introduction and assess the impact of its emergence. To what extent did African slavery change American society? You may want to consider social, economic, and geographical. Prior to the Atlantic slave trade, the arable land along the South Atlantic seaboard were owned by wealth landowners and farmed primarily by either Native American slaves or white indentured servants. Beginning in the late 16th century and becoming ever moreRead MoreThe Labor System Of Slavery Transformed The South During The Eighteenth Century967 Words   |  4 PagesPrompt:The labor system of slavery transformed the South during the eighteenth century. Discuss the impact of slavery on the economy of the South, as well as its impact on southern society and politics. In the 18th century the population of British America skyrocketed from 250,000 to more than two million, a great deal of this population increase was because of the increasing slave population and the slave natural increase (pg 107). As opposed to the century before when slaves were scarce, thereRead MoreAmerican Civil War Research Paper1118 Words   |  5 PagesThe deadliest war in American history is known as the American Civil War killing nearly 620,000 soldiers and a mass amount of civilians. The War Between the States was fought between Southern slave states and the United States federal government. Southern states formed a group called the Confederacy, which went against the beliefs of the Union. Jefferson Davis of the Confederate States of America and Abraham Lincoln sought different views on slavery. Lincoln believed that all slaves should beRead MoreThe Second American Revolution891 Words   |  4 PagesThe Second American Revolution Thesis Statement â€Å"The Civil War may also be termed as the second American Revolution in terms of the political, social and economic changes that occurred during the war† Introduction American Civil War was fought between 1861 and 1865. The war began because President Abraham Lincoln, elected in 1860, was very persistent on preserving the Union, which was threatened by the issue of slavery. The North was growing rapidly in wealth and population, and it was clear toRead MoreThe American Dream And Its Reality For Minority Americans903 Words   |  4 Pagestimes, Americans have always been determined to improve themselves both economically and socially. Even today, we are attempting to make society better by extending marriage rights to homosexuals and arguing the merits of flying the Confederate Battle flag over government buildings in non-historical situations. At the same time, concerns such as the impact of the Greek economic collapse on American business and the long-term cost of the Office of Personnel Management s data breech impact our beliefRead MoreThe Second American Revolution901 Words   |  4 PagesThe Second American Revolution Thesis Statement â€Å"The Civil War may also be termed as the second American Revolution in terms of the political, social and economic changes that occurred during the war† Introduction American Civil War was fought between 1861 and 1865. The war began because President Abraham Lincoln, elected in 1860, was very persistent on preserving the Union, which was threatened by the issue of slavery. The North was growing rapidly in wealth and population, and it was clearRead MoreSlavery And The American Economy1284 Words   |  6 PagesSlavery spans to nearly every culture, nationally, and religion and from ancient times to the present day. Slavery was a legal institution in which humans were legally considered property of another. In the 18th century, new ideas of human rights and freedom emerged out of the European Enlightenment stretching across the Americas and Europe. By the era of the American Revolution, the belief that slavery was wrong and would ultimately have to be abolished was widespread, in both the Americas and northernRead MoreSlavery And Its Effects On Society1440 Words   |  6 PagesSlavery spans to nearly every culture, nationality, and religion and f rom ancient times to the present day. Slavery was a legal institution in which humans were legally considered property of another. Slaves were brought to the American colonies, and were utilized in building the economic foundations of the new world. In the 18th century, new ideas of human rights and freedom emerged out of the European Enlightenment stretching across the Americas and Europe. By the era of the American RevolutionRead MoreEssay about President Abraham Lincoln1151 Words   |  5 PagesAmerica had led to a split between the Northern and Southern states. During the Antebellum period, the North became more industrialized as the South increased its agricultural production. The two sections developed differing economies and ideas and by April 14, 1861, at Fort Sumter, the tensions came to a head as the American Civil War began. Skillfully guiding the nation through this time of hardship and considered one of the greatest presidents in American history, Abraham Lincoln left a legacy that lives

Ilab Week 6 Math 221 Essay - 818 Words

Elementary Statistics iLab Week 6 Statistical Concepts: * Data Simulation * Discrete Probability Distribution * Confidence Intervals Calculations for a set of variables Mean Median 3.2 3.5 4.5 5.0 3.7 4.0 3.7 3.0 3.1 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.1 3.0 3.6 3.0 3.8 4.0 2.6 2.0 4.3 4.0 3.5 3.5 3.3 3.5 4.1 4.5 4.2 5.0 2.9 2.5 3.5 4.0 3.7 3.5 3.5 3.0 3.3 4.0 Calculating Descriptive Statistics Descriptive Statistics: Mean, Median Variable N N* Mean SE Mean StDev Minimum Q1 Median Q3 Maximum Mean 20 0 3.560 0.106 0.476 2.600 3.225 3.550 3.775 4.500 Median 20 0 3.600 0.169 0.754 2.000 3.000 3.500 4.000 5.000 Calculating Confidence Intervals for†¦show more content†¦The mean for the column â€Å"mean† is 3.56. It is very close to the parameter of interest but is not equal to it. You can calculate a confidence interval for the mean of the mean column, but a specific confidence interval would need to be provided. In that case, the confidence interval would be centered on 3.56, not 3.5. | 4. Give the mean for the median column of the Worksheet. Is this estimate centered about the parameter of interest (the parameter of interest is the answer for the mean in question 2) The mean for the median column is 3.6, which is close to the mean in question 2 but not as close as the answer in question 3. | 5. Give the standard deviation for the mean and median column. Compare these and be sure to identify which has the least variability? Standard Deviation of Mean= 0.4762Standard Deviation of Median= 0.7539The standard deviation of the Mean is smaller, which means all of the data points will tend to be very close to the Mean. The Median with a larger Standard Deviation will tend to have data points spread out over a large range of values. Since the Mean has the smaller value of the Standard Deviations, it has the least variability. | 6. Based on questions 3, 4, and 5 is the mean or median a better estimate for the parameter of interest? Explain your reasoning. The Mean seems to be the better estimate asShow MoreRelatedMath 221 Complete Course2525 Words   |  11 PagesMATH 221 COMPLETE COURSE A+ Graded Tutorial Available At: http://hwsoloutions.com/?product=math-221-complete-course Visit Our website: http://hwsoloutions.com/ Product Description PRODUCT DESCRIPTION MATH 221 COMPLETE COURSE, Discussions Week 1 Descriptive Statistics (graded) If you were given a large data set such as the sales over the last year of our top 1,000 customers, what might you be able to do with this data? What might be the benefits of describing the data? Week 2 Regression

Project Management International Conference on System

Question: Delivering successful projects is increasingly becoming a daunting task for most of the organisations that work on projects that deliver strategic, business and operational outcomes. Today there are many project management practices in use by project managers depending on the industry, organisation and its culture, in order to deliver project successfully. PRINCE2 is claimed to be a rapidly growing project management practice used internationally and specially in the UK Government sector, to manage projects regardless of its type and size. (PRINCE2.com) Task 01 (60 Marks) Select an organisation that has a implemented a successful Project Management Methodology and critically evaluate the process related to the following areas of Project Management: Project Selection Management of the Triple Constraints Risk Management Your answer should explain the practices, tools and techniques used and should be elaborated with suitable and relevant sample artefacts. Task 02 (40 Marks) Critically evaluate the PRINCE2 methodology against Waterfall and Agile methodologies and assess its suitability in using to manage and successfully deliver projects in Sri Lanka. Answer: 1: Project Selection The case study selected for the task is Portbase. This case has been selected for the reason that this is a very huge project, which has been built and developed based on the traditional Waterfall project management methodologies. The project has been working for longer period of time and has been experiencing various stages of positive and negative. Eventually, the management and administration has decided to transition the methodology to a new one, which has more Agility. The Portbase is a natural and reliable hub that is located through the Dutch ports for the logistic information necessary. It is the port-transcending Port Community System that has been developed to benefit the companies with many services that are intelligent for exchange of information between both the public and private sectors as also the companies. The project allows the optimization of the logistic processes by the participants, for the competitive position to be improved (Bannink, 2012). The non-profit organization works as non-profit organization and also serves for the port community. Portbase has been serving over 10,000 end users in over 2300 companies, through over the services of about 42. The project has been facing many challenges with the Waterfall methods, with which it has been operating. The Portbase project is developed with the methodology called Waterfall. There are many challenges that have been faced by the organization, from the Waterfall methodology. The waterfall method has been a viable project management methodology, when the project was developed initially. At the point of time, this methodology was considered as a standard methodology and eventually, the same methodology had been selected. However, in the later stages, the problems and challenges associated with the methodologies have been discovered. Though Waterfall methodology is completed structure methodology, certain challenges have been resulting and it even demanded to transition the project towards the Agile management methodology (Bannink, 2012). The following are the challenges of the project, being used by the Waterfall project management methodologies. Triple Budget Constraint The project has gone through many issues, in terms of time management. The reason is that the Waterfall method has the process, in such a way that the final product or outcome can be checked only at the end of the project. If there are any errors or missing of the features and any incompleteness, the process has to be started overall again. Eventually, the overall design and development tasks would be delayed and consume a lot of time. When the entire process has to be repeated, the overall budget or cost of the project has also been increasing to an extent that there will be no surprise if the budget is doubled or even more that. Challenges of delayed design Since, the entire process is completely structured, where each and every process is to be executed only one after the other, the process of design has taken the time, than the expected time. It is because of the major flaw associated with the methodology (Hajjdiab, et al., 2012). The result, which is the outcome after the ending stages of the process, may or may not meet the expectations or the objectives defined, at the time of commencement of the project. At that point of time, the result may need to modify, as there may be new developments or there may be new challenges that could be discovered, as the time goes on. The Waterfall methodology does not give any opportunity for the project manager or the team of the project to assess the quantity and quality of the result of the outcome, during the design and development of the product. If the challenges and developments are discovered after testing of the product at the end of the methodology, it would be disappointing for the team of the project. When the deviations are minor, the customer or sponsor may get compromised with the unsatisfied product. However, if the deviation is long and does not give the result as expected and does not fulfil the object of the project, it is definitely going to make a tedious challenge for the project team. Eventually, the correction and development of the objective of the product is going to take, almost double the time and duration of the project. If the final product after the development during the repetition of the product, it has been taking more than double the time of the project. Doubling the time or eve n more would make the resources to be wasted and it will have a definite and huge impact over the budget and resource allocation for the project. Risk Management The project is huge and involves thousands of customers from hundreds of companies. The risk management involves anticipation or prediction of the possible risks, associated with the hub. The risks are more of physical and eventually, they do have influence over the health and welfare of the employees, resulting in massive losses to the company and eventually over the reputation of the company. Poor communication, between the control of perception and phases Another major problem associated with the Portbase project development is the hierarchy and the level of communication among various levels of the management. The middle and upper level managements follow the approach of the command and control, would give least powers and privileges to the team of development of the product. It eventually, gives a lot of pressure ot the team of the project and they have not been able to take any decisions independently, even though there is a minor change proposed (Hajjdiab, et al., 2012). The protocol is completely designed and developed by only the management and the workforce or the team of the project would be left with the only option of following the commands. This kind of command and control approach involved in the Waterfall management methodology, would primarily effect the communication between the management and the members of the team. The communication here is made almost from one way, rather than two ways (Mahalakshmi Sundararajan, 2013). The Portbase project eventually, has taken a decision to transition the project management methodology from Waterfall to the new and modern methodologies that have been proven working better (Mahalakshmi Sundararajan, 2013). 2: Project Management Methodologies PRINCE2 Project Management Methodology PRICE2 is an acronym for the projects IN Controlled Environments and is developed in the UK. The methodology consists of six variables, timescales, risk, quality, benefits and scope. The methodologies include the focus and approach on stakeholder involvement, control through review, and business involvement right from the initiation till the end of the project with continuous and consistent improvement (Reid Amy, 2013). The design of PRINCE2 roles is very specific in design that includes customers, management, suppliers and other stakeholders. Relevance of Methodologies There is a perception in the project management methodologies that PRINCE2 is based on the approach of the traditional waterfall, where the waterfall approach was considered to be a good and standard for the project and software development. In the same way, Agile approach is also a relevant approach to PRINCE2. So, eventually, a new approach called PRINCE2 Agile has been developed, as an extension to PRINCE2. It is an indication of the modernization of the PRINCE2, which is variant deviation from the waterfall method. In a nutshell, PRINCE2 had been synonymous to Waterfall method and now has been associating and integrating with the Agile method, because of its flexibility and application that suits to the modern complex business project management. PRINCE2 is more about associating with the process. It is more of a linear structure that starts from the starting up a project, initiating project, managing the delivery of project, having the necessary stage boundaries and finally closing the project towards handing the business for its operations. Figure: PRINCE2 Project Management Methodology Source: Zen Ex Machine 2013 According to the expert and the project management body opinion, this process is more describes more of the waterfall approach to the execution of the project. This perception is because of the following factors. A stage of PRINCE2 is equivalent to the stage of Waterfall There would be a stage for each of the processes of analysis, development, design and testing The project needs to be locked down, before the design is moved towards development and comprehensively complete the a detailed set of the proposed requirements Waterfall method is usually assumed to be suitable for the larger projects to manage and develop. And it is not quite suitable for the smaller projects. When it comes to the Agile method, it is suitable for more of small size projects, instead of the larger projects. PRINCE2, has built the perception that this methodology is more suitable for the larger projects and inappropriate for the smaller projects (Reid Amy, 2013), is suitable for small projects too. It is because of the perception that the smaller projects would be inappropriate, as the methodology needs longer process in the development of the logs, lists, registers and documents. However, according to the OGC (Office for Government Commerce) in the UK, THE PRINCE2 processes can be tailored and more importantly can be scalable to implement for smaller to larger projects, so that it can be made suitable for various unique requirements and projects in various environment. With no tailoring of the processes, which are needed for the project to adapt quickly for varied environments, needs of the user, business and systems, the project will become bogged down in reporting, red tape, committee meeting and approval processes that are lengthy, which would paralyse instead, than enabling the projects quickly to act to move towards the direction of change. Such difficulty could enable to adapt to change would ultimately stands as a primary reason for the failure of the Waterfall methodology. The same reason, the project management methodology, PRINCE2 is enabled to be implemented in UK, UK and in Sri Lanka. Figure: Waterfall and Agile Project successes and failures Combining Prince2 And Agile PRINCE2 can be made flexible and scalable based on the application of the project management methodology, PRINCE2. This is the characteristic, which is close to Agile, which is flexible and iterative process. So, integration of the PRINCE2 and Agile is considered to be more effective. The key considered for unlocking the PRINCE2 methodology with the Agile is towards using it in the stage of the Management Product Delivery (Reid Amy, 2013). Agile processes help the project team to focus intensively, over the delivery of each of the Sprint that would coincide the requirements of management reporting of PRINCE2 and committee meeting cycles of the project. Here, the opportunities and potentials that would render better outcomes and results, from the integration of the PRINCE2 and Agile to some extent. Project Plan Stage Plans Work Packages Lessons Learned Reporting The PRINCE2, as opposed to the perception of application to only larger projects, it can be utilized to a better extent, to move towards the Agile, from the inherent similarities of the Waterfall methodology (Reid Amy, 2013). References: Bannink, S, Challenges in the Transition from Waterfall to Scrum A Casestudy at Portbase, University of Twente. Friis, D., Ostergaard, J. Sutherland, J. 2011 Virtual Reality Meets Scrum: How a Senior Team Moved from Management to Leadership. In Proceedings of the 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) Guidelines for Managing Projects (fully consistent with PRINCE2)from the UK Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR) Hajjdiab, H., Taleb, A. S. Ali, J 2012, An Industrial Case Study for Scrum Adoption. Journal of Software Karhatsu, H., Ikonen, M., Kettunen, P., Fagerholm, F. Abrahamsson, P 2010, Building blocks for self-organizing software development teams a framework model and empirical pilot study. In Proceedings of the 2010 2nd International Conference on Software Technology and Engineering (ICSTE) Mahalakshmi, M. Sundararajan, D. 2013, Traditional SDLC Vs Scrum MethodologyA Comparative Study. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering Marchenko, A. Abrahamsson, P 2008, Scrum in a Multiproject Environment: An Ethnographically- Inspired Case Study on the Adoption Challenges. In Proceedings of the Agile, 2008. AGILE '08. Conference. OGC (Office of Government Commerce), 2009, Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2(2009 ed.). TSO (The Stationery Office) Overhage, S., Schlauderer, S., Birkmeier, D. Miller, J. 2011, What Makes IT Personnel Adopt Scrum? A Framework of Drivers and Inhibitors to Developer Acceptance. In Proceedings of the 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) Reid, Amy, 2013 "Capita acquires majority stake in ITIL and PRINCE2".Association for project management. International project management association Sumrell, M. 2007, From waterfall to agile-how does a QA team transition? In Proceedings of the Agile Conference (AGILE), IEEE Winston, R 1970, Managing the development of large software systems. IEEE WESCON Zen Ex Machine, 2013, PRINCE2 Processes Vs. Agile Development Methodologies, viewed 19 July 2016, https://zenexmachina.wordpress.com/2013/04/03/prince2-processes-vs-agile-development-methodologies/f